Getting back to Priscilla's thread. Perhaps I am too old fashioned and traditional but I take the view that relationships are one thing but that (hopefully) once-in-a-lifetime marriage is too serious a thing, not to be taken lightly....whether one is in Nepal or Gambia or Tanzania or Uzbekistan. The first one has an "s" but that second word should be with no "s" at the end of it....or at least we can hope so.
Point number two, it's a fact muslims will traditionally marry muslims - not all of course, but in the majority. Same for catholics, traditionally they will marry another catholic who is like them, same folkways, mores and traditions. Same for jews, jains, zulus, maghrebians, etc etc.,you name it!
Within Nepal, same general phenomenon will generally be observed to this day, even if some will point out that things are slowly changing. Within the framework of a strong and often a socially enforced CASTE system, I've noticed that nepalis themselves will more often than not naturally gravitate to members of their own caste and comfortably marry "one of theirs"
What can be drawn from all this? Well, what you want...! For each person to decide. But the point remains that if people:
- speak the same tongue -
- share the same beliefs, attend the same temple, church or synagogue
- share the same values
- tend to think along the same lines
- were brought up with similar interests, very possibly attended the same school
- used to "same-same" traditions as the nepalis say
- and have numerous other things IN COMMON (like dress, etc.)
there is something good to be said for those norms.
My remarks should never be interpreted to mean that one cannot cross lines. Of course people should have the complete freedom I maintain to marry a madhesi, or a newar, or a kshtriya or a brahmin or a sudra if they are genuinely in love. That's both normal and obvious.