According to most, apart from some minor naughtiness and a few cock ups that would have no real effect on the results, the election was pretty much free and fair.
Only a fool would deny there was some jiggery-pokery going on, but it appears to have been pretty minor.
Is the Jakarta post doing its best to destabilise the results and sow doubt - or is it just good journalism?
https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/ … -rise.html
Some experts say the drastic increase in the PSI's votes contradicts the quick counts by various credible pollsters, which projected that the party had won less than 3 percent of the vote.
It fails to identify who the 'some experts' are, and appears to be saying the elections commission (KPU) is in some way part of the alleged "allegations of rampant fraud" the public is supposed to be concerned about.
I would invite the Jakarta post to identify the "Some experts" by name, and produce serious evidence of fraud (That would alter the election result in any significant way) they can prove.
That paper is running a lot of stories that appear to be questioning the election, but none appear to have anything as solid as evidence.
It strikes me, if you are printing stuff that has even vaguely accuses anyone, or has any potential to (in even the slightest way) destabilise Indonesia, they should put up serious evidence or shut up and apologise to the KPU, PSI, and the Indonesian people in general.