Menu
Expat.com

Climate change and the Paris Agreement: A personal, national, and intercontinental responsibility

climate change
Pixabay / Pexels
Written byMaria Iotovaon 23 February 2021

Science has proven that climate change is the result of human activity and the industrial revolution, which started with the steam engine and continued with mass production and digital technology. Hence, it’s widely agreed that a radical shift in human behaviour is needed to fight the threats against the environment and humanity due to climate change. How can you, expats, help?

In the US, the average annual carbon footprint for an individual is 16 tons, while for the rest of the world is 4 tons. To achieve the ambitious goals of the Paris Agreement, everyone must drop their individual annual carbon footprint to 2 tons by 2050. Small everyday life changes may have a positive impact on climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic has shown that we are capable of adapting and changing for the common good. To this end, carbon emissions must top the policy lists of all leaders globally so that we can get on the track of saving the planet.

What is the Paris Agreement

The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It came into force in 2016, a year after it was introduced at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris. The Paris Agreement's goal is to limit global warming below 2 degrees Celsius because temperatures above this will expose 37% of the world's population to extreme heat waves, according to NASA Global Climate Change. To this end, nearly every country on earth has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. 

In addition to scientific instruments and technology utilisation, for the Paris Agreement's overambitious plan to materialise, socioeconomic transformation is also required. In fact, industrialised countries — and the world's largest carbon emitters — must support climate change resilience-building in less-developed nations, which are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change. 

In 2020, nations submitted their climate schemes (aka Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs) with mandatory actions to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for the negative impacts of rising temperatures. Under the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), countries will report on their emissions, reduction efforts, adaptation measures, and given or received support in order to obtain feedback and participate in a collective review of the progress towards long-term goals, which will take place every five years.

The peculiar incident of the USA

In 2015, the USA entered the Paris Agreement under the presidency of Mr Barack Obama, who had envisioned, among others, a “safer and more secure” world. Fast forward two years, on June 1, 2017, President Donald Trump announced his plan to withdraw the country from the treaty. Indeed, on November 4, 2020, the US was officially no longer a member of the agreement, and the US's environmental policies were taking a different (and somewhat hazardous) route. The good news is that the US will rejoin the Paris Agreement under the leadership of its new president, Mr. Joe Biden, who signed an executive order at the White House shortly after his January inauguration. 

How countries perform  

In theory, the Paris Agreement unites all nations under the umbrella of an ambitious fight against human-caused climate change. However, in reality, the picture of greenhouse gas emissions remains hazy. According to a conclusion published by the Universal Ecological Fund, an environmental non-profit seeking to increase awareness and encourage actions, countries' promises to reduce carbon emissions aren't adequate to stop global temperatures from rising and therefore posing irreversible environmental, social, and health destructions. 

The Universal Ecological Fund's report predicts that by 2030, extreme weather events will be a genuine threat to health, biodiversity, and primary needs such as water, food, and basic income. China and India, the world's first and fourth biggest emitters, will produce even more carbon emissions by 2030, while the US, the second-biggest emitter, has made an insignificant commitment based on an inadequate GHG emissions' reduction programme. At the same time, Russia, the fifth-biggest emitter, hasn't presented a plan yet. On the other hand, the European Union, the third-biggest emitter, has committed to reducing emissions by 40% or more by 2030, and the continent seems to be on the right path to achieving its goal.

Which countries have not ratified the Paris Agreement 

Seven countries have not yet ratified the Paris Agreement, and these are Iran, Turkey, Iraq, Eritrea, Libya, South Sudan, and war-torn Yemen. Iran, Libya, and Iraq are members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec). Turkey is the only G20 and OECD member nation not to have formally validated the deal after Russia, which did so in October 2019. Turkey has the prospects and the right circumstances to cut emissions and rely more on renewable energies but is focused on continuous growth of coal-fired power plants to meet the increasing energy demands. Angola was the last country to sign the climate agreement in August 2020, after Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon.

What can you do to reduce your carbon footprint? 

As individuals, we produce carbon emissions daily — some more than others, depending on our conscious or subconscious life choices and the country we live in. For instance, if you don't have a car and ride your bicycle or walk to places, you automatically save about two tonnes of CO2 per year. Public transportation and carpooling (out of peak hours) are the next most sustainable solutions unless you can purchase an electric car. But then you must take into account that tons of carbon dioxide are emitted during the production of the car's battery.  

Suppose you are an expat who moves regularly and must rent different homes. In that case, it's unrealistic to invest in sustainable home supplies, such as energy star certified electrical products, LED lights, roof solar panels, and a solar boiler. However, some investments are worth considering (e.g., energy-efficient refrigerator and dishwasher) if you want to reduce your carbon footprint and take responsibility for climate change. Other smaller actions at home include reducing drafts, fixing leaks, and insulating walls to keep your place warm without exploiting the heating system. 

When it comes to materials' consumption, think of the three Rs: reuse, reduce, recycle to decrease your contribution to climate change. Food is a rather complicated aspect. Eating locally has proven to reduce your CO2 emissions because you bypass the transportation part of the process. However, it is argued that emissions from transportation amount to a small number of the total emissions from food. Hence, the type of food you eat appears to be a more important factor than where your food is coming from. Animal-based foods (i.e., meat and dairy) have a much higher carbon footprint than plant-based foods. In fact, processes such as the application of fertilisers and the production of methane by cattle, in combination with deforestation of land for agricultural use, account for 80% of the footprint produced by food industries.  

By definition, expats are travellers. Air travel is among the largest producers of carbon emissions. International travel amid the pandemic has dramatically decreased, giving us the opportunity to reflect on how we want to travel in a post-pandemic era. If video-conferencing isn't an option and you must fly, search for non-stop flights since landing and takeoff consume more fuel and produce more carbon dioxide. According to the World Bank, passengers in first and business classes have up to nine times higher carbon footprint because they are allowed more luggage and are sparsely distributed. Last but not least, you can offset the carbon emissions you produce during your flight by paying the appropriate amount to a project that reduces greenhouse gases. Many airlines offer the option to offset directly with them when you book your ticket. 

If you want to read more on climate change and the Paris Agreement, and find out how your expat or home country performs, check out our sources. 

Everyday life
climate change
About

I'm a freelance journalist and editor for the travel, non-profit, and news sectors. I have lived in Greece, England, Ghana, South Korea, Mauritius, and Rwanda.

Comments

  • golokaproject
    golokaproject3 years ago(Modified)
    This whole notion of "carbon footprint" is based on illogical idea that we must somehow eliminate CO2 from the earth. If we are successful doing that, the entire earth will become a barren wasteland with zero plant life and zero animal life. Remember the carbon cycle from grade school? Plants REQUIRE CO2 to live and return pure Oxygen to support the animal life.
  • cvco
    cvco3 years ago(Modified)
    Sorry, the first line of the article is wrong so it makes the whole thing wrong. There is NO scientific agreement that climate change is man-made, its controversial at best and would be present if no human being existed at all. We would still have natural cycles. There are two problems. One, how much of our problem is man made vs. nature? Second, how much can man influence change? Lets say man contributes 2% of the change, but to erase that 2% influence requires trillions of dollars and a new life without any tech or industry or oil. Is it worth such change for 2%? Greta Thundberg thinks so because she is a kid who doesnt know any better, but people with actual knowledge and experience would say no. Still, can expats get the feeling of contribution by reducing their footprint in the world? Sure. Recycle, use less things, drive less. It cant hurt but you are wrong and i'll certainly be among those who fight against the creation of a new life for 2%. But since you, the author, think the way you do, then come out with the honest truth based on your opinion ---eliminate 6.5 billion people from the planet. Go ahead, do it, then you will achieve 100% nature as the creator of climate cycles and Im just wondering, what will you do then?
  • Tediuki
    Tediuki3 years ago(Modified)
    Expat.com should avoid subjects which are ridiculous and should concentrate on its core goals.
  • Tediuki
    Tediuki3 years ago(Modified)
    President Donald Trump did the best thing and walked away from the Paris farce . Meanwhile China gets a free pass until 2030 and India remains the largest global polluter. Now the Dems are undoing all of Emperor Trumps good work whilst increasing the US carbon footprint, increasing the oil price, and removing the current US energy self sufficiency status because they're bad losers in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, they haven't a clue on reality, they simply haven't a clue on sustainable governance, or fiscal accountability. The only correlation between carbon levels and temperature are 400 years apart. The earth is actually at the lower end of CO2 and temperature levels historically. President Trump lowered the US carbon footprint by a larger margin than every other nation whilst not being part of the Paris smoke screen. This whole topic is a farce and a con. Yes, we want to reduce pollution and live in a clean society but the snow fell so heavily in Texas as a result of global warming that their stupid solar farms were covered and produced zero electricity, the power supply consequently had a catastrophic failure. Globally, green energy leads to an unreliable power supply and sky high electricity bills. Thorium nuclear power stations should be built instead. Green energy in the form of Chinese wind farms and Chinese solar energy farms are not economically viable when one taxes fossil fuels to pay for it. No one has yet come up with an answer as to what will happen to the mountain of solar panels which is accumulating as a result of replacement either! The carbon emissions caused during the production of these windmills and solar panels are huge. The Dems are about to embark on more borrowing this year than the previous 200 years of borrowing combined in order to bail out bankrupt Democrat run towns, cities, and states. National debt, and the consequential interest payments, are about to skyrocket above 100% of GDP whilst the economy is being hit hard by typical socialist fiscal policies which don't work. Meanwhile, the US could be on the precipice of embracing another act of lunacy, the global reset, and may well plunge itself into the black hole of communism! They got away with blatant vote rigging in the swing states and lets sit back and watch everything slide down the pan while we still wait for the sea levels to rise, polar bear extinction, the Hunter Biden laptop enquiry, and the Lolita express list of frequent flyers club to be released. Not that we have any free speech any more with big tech and the fake news media not allowing anyone to mention anything other than their twisted narrative.
  • Inubia
    Inubia3 years ago(Modified)
    One of the things that I really have enjoyed about this website has been that everyone has come here just to help each other, we have all pretty much kept our own crazy political ideas to ourself. This op-ed piece ought to be deleted immediately.
  • aandbfields
    aandbfields3 years ago(Modified)
    this article presents unproven theories as scientific facts. Even the IPCC are nit stupid enough to claim certainty that carbon dioxide at 0.04 percent of the atmosphere is a control knob for temperature, the average global temperature, if there is such a thing, has increased by about 1 degree bringing great benefit to the world. Mych if the increase us in less cold winters rather than hotter summers. Don't read the headlines, check out the actual historical data.
  • Ed & Olga
    Ed & Olga3 years ago(Modified)
    Climate Czar Kerry…….Only liberals could pick a liberal hypocrite with 6 houses, 12 cars, 2 yachts and a private jet to tell the American people that they should take the bus to combat air pollution.
  • Wilhelm van der Kolk
    Wilhelm van der Kolk3 years ago(Modified)
    I,m coming from the Netherlands and living now 10 years in the Philippines. Holland is for me a crazy country in the war to the envoirement. The people pay a lot of tax,for a small reducion. Let,s use that money for clean up Asia and Africa.

More articles

View all articles

Articles to help you in your expat project

  • Getting married in Qatar
    Getting married in Qatar

    Getting married in Qatar could be a hassle for newbies. However, knowing the right procedure and information ...

  • Getting married in Saudi Arabia
    Getting married in Saudi Arabia

    Saudi Arabia is a country that holds marriage and family as one of its core values. It is a privilege to get ...

  • Getting married in the Philippines
    Getting married in the Philippines

    Getting married in the Philippines provides a backdrop of immense beauty through stunning beaches, tropical ...

  • Getting married in Vietnam
    Getting married in Vietnam

    Have you met that perfect someone who you want to spend the rest of your life with? Luckily, getting married in ...

  • Getting married in Greece
    Getting married in Greece

    Dreaming of getting married in Greece? Whether you're a foreigner or a Greek citizen, tying the knot in this ...

  • Retiring in Tunisia
    Retiring in Tunisia

    Sun, a relaxed lifestyle, traditional souks, incense, modernism, an effective health system, etc. All these are ...

  • Marriage in Hong Kong
    Marriage in Hong Kong

    There are many reasons why you may want to get married in Hong Kong. You could be a long-term expat and have ...

  • Marriage in Brazil
    Marriage in Brazil

    Brazil can be a romantic country, and you may want to marry here. Perhaps you even want to remain in Brazil ...

All guide articles