Our lives with 5G and beyond, fears, concerns or objections

I go online using a tablet, never had or wanted a cell phone.  Will I also suffer the same problems?

That is a very good question.  If the tablet is using WIFI and it has 5G connection capability, the SAR specs can be the same.  However, most tab users do not have cell phone capability or hold the unit up to their heads so there will be much less radiation than a cell phone. 

You should be fine the way you use it, if you are staying with a 4G router. 

The biggest issue with cell phones come with the transmit phase.  It is in this phase that the phone uses the higher power to get the data/voice packets out.  All of this comes under Non-Ionizing Radiation (NIR) exposure in the RF/MW frequencies, which means instead of producing charged ions when passing through matter (Ionizing Radiation), it has sufficient energy only for excitation; which still causes biological effects/anomalies to our bodies.

Note:  When we cook/heat food in a MW Oven, that is NIR or "excitation" at work.

In the coming years, all persons using a MIMO Router to connect in their homes wirelessly, will be exposed more.  Example, I use CAT 7 cable (now available in CAT 8: https://www.amazon.com/Ethernet-Outdoor … s9dHJ1ZQ==) to connect to my iMac via the ethernet port, to minimize wired signal losses and to not have a wireless connection to the internet, as I sit in front of this 27" iMac for hours, at times. BTW - PLDT is still using CAT 5 cable with their equipment resulting in slower/chocked speeds.

Back to your question - Most tabs do not have a ethernet port and can only connect wirelessly.

PS.  If you can get a decent wired or fiber connection to your home and avoid 5G wireless connections, you will be better.  If in the future, you get a laptop and connect it via the fast ethernet port, then turn your 5G router WIFI off, you will be in the safest setup. 

Nearly all good routers will come with ethernet ports for wired internet connections.  Just make sure the 5G WIFI portion can be switched off.  It sounds counter productive but a super fast fiber signal will not harm humans.  It is the Router's ability to turn that fast fiber signal into a 5G WIFI signal; that is then broadcasted thru your home - that creates the concerns I bring up in my post.

Thank you, I appear to be good, 4G only.

Yes, and sorry for the long response but this is an important topic for me since I have been fighting VA for 4+ years regarding a tumor caused by RF/MW NIR exposure.

Sorry if this appears to be a little off-topic...but it appears really worrying in terms of our very own human privacy...5G/6G/AI/AI++...that would include my fears & objections.
Also who is keeping watch on these very watchers?
Omo
This youtube clip kind of addresses the matter....some countries are all out to achieve outcomes out of all this new ever evolving tech which is amazing but just leaves you with even more questions.
Again Omo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0dMTAQ … ture=share

No worries, you also ask a very good question.  Since I am still working on keeping answers shorter, I will attempt to give short clear answers.

Who is watching?  In the USA, the key to watching this process is centered on whom controls the spectrum and allocation of bandwidth.  Spectrum management is found under US Dept. of Commerce, NTIA.  The NTIA does this from the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee. 

In other countries the systems can include bids, and locations from certain departments to business owners where millions are exchanged for these rights or licenses.

As a country runs out of the nearly exhausted lower frequencies, the more complex higher freqs & bandwidth continue to push leading edge technologies as we become more of a digital society. 

Storage in the cloud is another way to use dedicated servers that manage data sets within the web.  Therefore, sending info and retrieving info from the "cloud" continues to place market pressures on newer/faster technologies that can operate in the newer/faster remaining spectrums with this increased demand on data transfers. 

Some countries tie this into the need to grow market share based on current or projected penetration.  I once saw research on WIFI and countries with certain building standards.  If a country builds homes mostly that are cement based vs a wood frame home (typical for many US Homes), which home would a person think would have a stronger WIFI signal?  WIFI is known to have less loss thru a less solid mass.

In summary, there will be less and less "guardrails" with 5G & 6G, until more humans are diagnosed with exponential increases in upper body tumors, IMHO. 

With nearly every new medical anomaly we see, it is the reactions that get the late attention, not the persons trying to be proactive.

It is not my intent to grow conspiracy theories ......  I am posting on facts already in the public domain.  Thanks for voicing your concerns and the questions.